<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Colossians 2:14</title>
	<atom:link href="http://versebyversecommentary.com/1996/08/05/colossians-214/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://versebyversecommentary.com/colossians/colossians-214/</link>
	<description>by Dr. Grant C. Richison</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:49:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://versebyversecommentary.com/colossians/colossians-214/comment-page-1/#comment-117459</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://versebyversecommentary.com/1996/08/05/colossians-214/#comment-117459</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jakob, there&#160;are&#160;about 7 different&#160;uses&#160;of the word &quot;law&quot; in the&#160;New Testament.&#160;There is a reference to the law as&#160;the Bible as&#160;a whole but then there is the reference to&#160;the Mosaic law, or even sometimes merely&#160;as a reference to&#160;an aspect of the Mosaic&#160;law. The context must&#160;determine the usage. The usage in Mt&#160;has to do with Scriptures whereas the usage in&#160;Colossians has to&#160;do&#160;with the&#160;Mosaic law.&#160;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jakob, there&nbsp;are&nbsp;about 7 different&nbsp;uses&nbsp;of the word &quot;law&quot; in the&nbsp;New Testament.&nbsp;There is a reference to the law as&nbsp;the Bible as&nbsp;a whole but then there is the reference to&nbsp;the Mosaic law, or even sometimes merely&nbsp;as a reference to&nbsp;an aspect of the Mosaic&nbsp;law. The context must&nbsp;determine the usage. The usage in Mt&nbsp;has to do with Scriptures whereas the usage in&nbsp;Colossians has to&nbsp;do&nbsp;with the&nbsp;Mosaic law.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakob Puckett</title>
		<link>http://versebyversecommentary.com/colossians/colossians-214/comment-page-1/#comment-117458</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob Puckett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://versebyversecommentary.com/1996/08/05/colossians-214/#comment-117458</guid>
		<description>Oops.&#160;*not even part of the law*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops.&nbsp;*not even part of the law*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakob Puckett</title>
		<link>http://versebyversecommentary.com/colossians/colossians-214/comment-page-1/#comment-117457</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakob Puckett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://versebyversecommentary.com/1996/08/05/colossians-214/#comment-117457</guid>
		<description>Dr. Grant,
This may be a bad question,&#160;but if&#160;it is it&#160;should not&#160;be hard to answer.&#160;This verse&#160;says the God canceled&#160;the law, but Jesus said that even on part of the law would pass away (Mt. 5:18).&#160;How can these be reconciled? Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Grant,<br />
This may be a bad question,&nbsp;but if&nbsp;it is it&nbsp;should not&nbsp;be hard to answer.&nbsp;This verse&nbsp;says the God canceled&nbsp;the law, but Jesus said that even on part of the law would pass away (Mt. 5:18).&nbsp;How can these be reconciled? Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

