http://versebyversecommentary.com/1-peter/1-peter-31c/ by Dr. Grant C. Richison Thu, 24 May 2012 18:49:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://versebyversecommentary.com/1-peter/1-peter-31c/comment-page-1/#comment-53977 Grant Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:26:25 +0000 http://versebyversecommentary.com/1997/08/05/1-peter-31c/#comment-53977 Mandy, thanks for your blog. Notice I did not say that femininity is for the mutual exclusive purpose of helping her husband reach achievement. Remember, the role of the husband (3:7) is to love the wife sacrificially. However, the role of the wife in marriage is found many places in Scripture such as Ephesians 5, Colossians 3, and other passages. This passage explains more why God created femininity: http://versebyversecommentary.com/2002/11/02/1-corinthians-117-9/ Mandy, thanks for your blog. Notice I did not say that femininity is for the mutual exclusive purpose of helping her husband reach achievement. Remember, the role of the husband (3:7) is to love the wife sacrificially. However, the role of the wife in marriage is found many places in Scripture such as Ephesians 5, Colossians 3, and other passages. This passage explains more why God created femininity: http://versebyversecommentary.com/2002/11/02/1-corinthians-117-9/

]]> http://versebyversecommentary.com/1-peter/1-peter-31c/comment-page-1/#comment-53901 Mandy Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:38:45 +0000 http://versebyversecommentary.com/1997/08/05/1-peter-31c/#comment-53901 If feminity is rooted in helping a man achieve the goal of leadership in the family, and not in the fundamental essence of who she is as a feminine image-bearer of God, I suppose an unmarried or widowed woman is not feminine? If feminity is rooted in helping a man achieve the goal of leadership in the family, and not in the fundamental essence of who she is as a feminine image-bearer of God, I suppose an unmarried or widowed woman is not feminine?

]]>