<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daniel 2:43-45</title>
	<atom:link href="http://versebyversecommentary.com/2002/02/22/daniel-243-45/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://versebyversecommentary.com/daniel/daniel-243-45/</link>
	<description>by Dr. Grant C. Richison</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:49:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://versebyversecommentary.com/daniel/daniel-243-45/comment-page-1/#comment-45683</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 12:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://versebyversecommentary.com/2002/02/22/daniel-243-45/#comment-45683</guid>
		<description>Rich,



2:43
  ???? ???????? conj.-Peal pf. 2 m.s. (1092) as you saw
  ?????????? n.m.s.-def.art. (1108) the iron
  ??????? v.2:41 Pael ptc.pass. (1107) mixed
  ???????? ?????? v.2:41 prep.-n.m.s. cstr. (1093)-n.m.s.-def.art. (1094) with miry clay (with the pottery of clay)
  ???????????? Hithpael ptc. m.p. (1107) so mix
  ??????? Peal impf. 3 m.p. (1089) they will
  ???????? ???????? prep.-n.m.s. cstr. (1091)-n.m.s.-def.art. (1081) with one another in marriage (by the seed of man)
  ????????????? conj.-neg.-v.supra but they will not
  ????????? Peal ptc. m.p. (1087) hold
  ?????? ?????????? demons.pr. m.-prep.-demons.pr. m. (1088) together (this with this)
  ????????? demons.part. (1089)-prep.-conj. just as (behold as)
  ????????? v.supra iron
  ??? ????????? neg.-v.supra does not mix
  ???????????? prep.-n.m.s.-def.art. (1093) with clay


Owens, J. J. (1989-). Analytical key to the Old Testament (Da 2:43). Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Book House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich,</p>
<p>2:43<br />
  ???? ???????? conj.-Peal pf. 2 m.s. (1092) as you saw<br />
  ?????????? n.m.s.-def.art. (1108) the iron<br />
  ??????? v.2:41 Pael ptc.pass. (1107) mixed<br />
  ???????? ?????? v.2:41 prep.-n.m.s. cstr. (1093)-n.m.s.-def.art. (1094) with miry clay (with the pottery of clay)<br />
  ???????????? Hithpael ptc. m.p. (1107) so mix<br />
  ??????? Peal impf. 3 m.p. (1089) they will<br />
  ???????? ???????? prep.-n.m.s. cstr. (1091)-n.m.s.-def.art. (1081) with one another in marriage (by the seed of man)<br />
  ????????????? conj.-neg.-v.supra but they will not<br />
  ????????? Peal ptc. m.p. (1087) hold<br />
  ?????? ?????????? demons.pr. m.-prep.-demons.pr. m. (1088) together (this with this)<br />
  ????????? demons.part. (1089)-prep.-conj. just as (behold as)<br />
  ????????? v.supra iron<br />
  ??? ????????? neg.-v.supra does not mix<br />
  ???????????? prep.-n.m.s.-def.art. (1093) with clay</p>
<p>Owens, J. J. (1989-). Analytical key to the Old Testament (Da 2:43). Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Book House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Jackson</title>
		<link>http://versebyversecommentary.com/daniel/daniel-243-45/comment-page-1/#comment-44883</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://versebyversecommentary.com/2002/02/22/daniel-243-45/#comment-44883</guid>
		<description>A through understand of the Hebrew would be very helpful. I have seen lots of opinions based on the different version of scripture. Very few address the fact that the NKJV indicates a distinction  between the &quot;they&quot; and the &quot;seed of men.&quot;  Couple that with the increase of alien abductions in the last few decades, an estimated 3% by the Roper polling outfit, and personal testimony of Christian abduction victims that say these &quot;aliens&quot; stop immediately when the name of the Lord Jesus Christ is called upon and it seems to me to be fallen angels, masquerading as ETs. Why is a very good question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A through understand of the Hebrew would be very helpful. I have seen lots of opinions based on the different version of scripture. Very few address the fact that the NKJV indicates a distinction  between the &#8220;they&#8221; and the &#8220;seed of men.&#8221;  Couple that with the increase of alien abductions in the last few decades, an estimated 3% by the Roper polling outfit, and personal testimony of Christian abduction victims that say these &#8220;aliens&#8221; stop immediately when the name of the Lord Jesus Christ is called upon and it seems to me to be fallen angels, masquerading as ETs. Why is a very good question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny R. Davis</title>
		<link>http://versebyversecommentary.com/daniel/daniel-243-45/comment-page-1/#comment-1723</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny R. Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://versebyversecommentary.com/2002/02/22/daniel-243-45/#comment-1723</guid>
		<description>It would appear to me that the “Seed of Men” mention in (Dan. 2:43) is the human race and the Kings who try to mingle the iron and clay are fallen angels.  Satan tried it once already in genesis with the daughters of men.(Nephilim) With the current condition of things and the coming of Anti-christ, I would not be surprised if he tried something like that again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would appear to me that the “Seed of Men” mention in (Dan. 2:43) is the human race and the Kings who try to mingle the iron and clay are fallen angels.  Satan tried it once already in genesis with the daughters of men.(Nephilim) With the current condition of things and the coming of Anti-christ, I would not be surprised if he tried something like that again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

